vol. 37, Issue #4

Online Journal Article:"MAKING SENSE OF REV 20:1!10? HAROLD HOEHNER VERSUS RECAPITULATION" - R. FOWLER W H I T E * JETS 37/4 (December 1994) 539-551

https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/37/37-4/JETS_37-4_539-551_White.pdf

Plot

Complete article may be found here:
https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/37/37-4/JETS_37-4_539-551_White.pdf

"MAKING SENSE OF REV 20:1!10?
HAROLD HOEHNER VERSUS RECAPITULATION" -
R. FOWLER W H I T E *
JETS 37/4 (December 1994) 539-551

Excerpt:
The purpose of this article is to offer a critique of Harold Hoehner's 1992
essay on Rev 20:1-101 with special reference to his arguments against the
thesis I advanced in an earlier article....
In support of my thesis I observed first t hat the nations'
destruction-after deception in 19:11-21 does not logically cohere with their protection-
from-deception in 20:1-3 and t h a t premillennial attempts to explain their
coherence in terms of chronological progression are unconvincing. Specifically I challenged
the premillennial postulate t hat "the nations" of
20:3 are survivors of the battle in 19:19-21. I urged that this claim simply
presupposes that the order of the visions in 19:11-20:3 reflects the sequence
of events in history --from the first page of the article